Outcomes of patients with IgA nephropathy according to treatment modality
Autori:
Ines Bosnić Kovačić, Bojana Maksimović, Željka Jureković, Lada Zibar, Bojana Šimunov, Branislav Čingel, Snježana Šulc, Ivan Margeta, Ksenija Vučur Šimić, Danica Galešić Ljubanović, Petar Šenjug, Vanja Ivković, Mladen Knotek, Mario Laganović
Sažetak
Summary
Introduction: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) exhibits variable clinical course and prognosis. To assess prognosis International IgAN Prediction (IgAN-PT) score was developed, and predicts the risk of a 50 % decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or end-stage renal disease after biopsy. Only patients with a high risk of progression despite three months of optimized supportive care are considered for a six-month course of glucocorticoid therapy. Aim: of this study was to investigate which patients were more likely to receive immunosuppressive therapy (IS) and renal outcomes in patients treated with IS. Patients and methods: The retrospective cohort study included 48 patients (33 male), median age 50 years (interquartile range IQR 35–59), median follow-up 43 months (IQR 18–54), treated at Clinical Hospital Merkur for a newly diagnosed idiopathic IgAN from 2012 to 2021 Results: Seventeen patients were treated with IS. They had more frequently mesangial lesions (M) (82 % vs. 54 %, p=0.05), endocapillary hypercellularity (E) (65 % vs. 21 %, p=0.004) and crescents (C) (41 % vs. 14 %, p=0.04). There was no difference in eGFR at biopsy (52 (IQR 38–81) vs. 46 (IQR 30–72) mL/min/1.73 m2, p<0.05), but patients treated with IS had better eGFR after 2-year follow-up (66 (IQR 37–97) vs. 34 (IQR 20–56) mL/min/1.73 m2, p=0.02). Urinary protein to creatinine ratio (uPCR) decreased after the treatment (at biopsy vs. end of follow-up,
106 (IQR 50–317) vs. 47(IQR 20–129) mg/mmol)). Still, there was no difference in baseline or end of follow-up uPCR between patients receiving IS and not. IIgAN score decreased after the treatment (at biopsy vs. at 2-year follow- up (10.56 %±12.66 % vs. 8.45 %±9.22 %, p=0.01) without difference between those treated with IS and not. Conclusion: Patients with higher M, E and C score were more likely to be treated with IS, and had better eGFR after 2-year follow-up. uPCR and IIgAN score improved irrespective of the treatment modality.